Study the following information carefully to answer the questions given below :

Following criteria have been laid down for admission to Anti - Terrorist Defensive course of India Army. The candidate must ----

(A) have passed graduation with Science subjects (B. Sc.) with minimum 50% marks in aggregated (second class). For SC/ST candidates, there is a relaxation of 5%.

(B) have completed 19 years of age in case of females and 20 years of age in case of males on or before Ist January 2003.

(C) pay deposit of Rs. 25,000 along with the application form if the applicant has passed graduation in second Class.

However, if the applicant has secured more than 75% marks at graduation, the deposit amount would be Rs. 15,000 and if marks are above 60% but below 75%, the deposit amount will be Rs. 20,000. If the candidate is a son or daughter of the serving or ex - defence staff member, the amount of deposit will be 50% of that applicable to others, keeping the merit criteria the same.

(D) For SC/ST candidates, the deposit amount is 20% of that applicable to non - staff relation candidates and the condition of marks for each slab described above in (C) is relaxable by 5%

(E) If a candidate fulfills the criteria at (A) and (B) but can pay at least three - fourths amount of applicable deposit, he/she may be provisionally admitted.

(F) If a candidate who is eligible under (A) and (B) criteria, can pay at least half of the applicable deposit, the case can be referred to the Commander - in - chief.

(G) The candidate who are eligible under the criteria (A) and (B) but cannot pay even half of the applicable deposit cannot be admitted.

Based on the above criteria, decide which of the following courses of action should be taken in case of the candidates whose description is provided in the following questions. Please note that you are not to assume any data other than those described. However, you may treat the candidate as 'General Category' candidate if his category is not explicitly mentioned as SC/ST. The information provided is as on 1.1.2003.

Tanya, the daughter of an ex - employee of India Army, was born on Ist April, 1981. She passed her B.Sc. examination with 68% marks. She can remit Rs. 11,000 as deposit.

Study the following information carefully to answer the questions given below :

Following criteria have been laid down for admission to Anti - Terrorist Defensive course of India Army. The candidate must ----

(A) have passed graduation with Science subjects (B. Sc.) with minimum 50% marks in aggregated (second class). For SC/ST candidates, there is a relaxation of 5%.

(B) have completed 19 years of age in case of females and 20 years of age in case of males on or before Ist January 2003.

(C) pay deposit of Rs. 25,000 along with the application form if the applicant has passed graduation in second Class.

However, if the applicant has secured more than 75% marks at graduation, the deposit amount would be Rs. 15,000 and if marks are above 60% but below 75%, the deposit amount will be Rs. 20,000. If the candidate is a son or daughter of the serving or ex - defence staff member, the amount of deposit will be 50% of that applicable to others, keeping the merit criteria the same.

(D) For SC/ST candidates, the deposit amount is 20% of that applicable to non - staff relation candidates and the condition of marks for each slab described above in (C) is relaxable by 5%

(E) If a candidate fulfills the criteria at (A) and (B) but can pay at least three - fourths amount of applicable deposit, he/she may be provisionally admitted.

(F) If a candidate who is eligible under (A) and (B) criteria, can pay at least half of the applicable deposit, the case can be referred to the Commander - in - chief.

(G) The candidate who are eligible under the criteria (A) and (B) but cannot pay even half of the applicable deposit cannot be admitted.

Based on the above criteria, decide which of the following courses of action should be taken in case of the candidates whose description is provided in the following questions. Please note that you are not to assume any data other than those described. However, you may treat the candidate as 'General Category' candidate if his category is not explicitly mentioned as SC/ST. The information provided is as on 1.1.2003.

Sulekha, the daughter of an ex - employee of ABC Medical College, was born on 23rd October, 1983. She has passed her B.Sc with 58% marks. She can pay only Rs. 20,000 as deposit.

In the question below, two statements are given followed by Conclusions numbered I and II. The candidate has to assume all the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts and then decide which of the given two Conclusions logically follows from the information given in the statements and mark the option best suited.

Statements:

I. Some remarks are comments.

II. Some comments are birds.

Conclusions:

I. Some remarks are birds.

II. Some birds are comments. 

In the question below, two statements are given followed by Conclusions numbered I and II. The candidate has to assume all the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts and then decide which of the given two Conclusions logically follows from the information given in the statements and mark the option best suited.

Statement :

I. All bush are plant.

II. Some plant are tree.

Conclusion :

I. All bush are tree.

II. No bush are tree.

In the question below, three statements are given followed by Conclusions numbered I, II and III. The candidate has to assume all the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts and then decide which of the given two Conclusions logically follows from the information given in the statements and mark the option best suited.

Statement :

I. No sweet are toffee.

II. No toffee are coffee.

III. No coffee are cup.

Conclusion :

I. No cup is coffee.

II. No coffee is toffee.

III. No toffee is sweet.

In the question below, three statements are given followed by Conclusions numbered I, II and III. The candidate has to assume all the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts and then decide which of the given two Conclusions logically follows from the information given in the statements and mark the option best suited.

Statement :

I. No sweet are toffee.

II. No toffee are coffee.

III. No toffee are ice cream.

Conclusion :

I. No coffee are toffee.

II. Some sweet are coffee.

III. All sweet are ice cream.

Directions : In the question, given below, there are two statements labelled as Assertion (A) and Reason (R).

Assertion (A) :  Petrol fire cannot be extinguished by pouring water over it.

Reason (R) : Water is heavier than petrol.

In the question below, three statements are given followed by Conclusions numbered I, II and III. The candidate has to assume all the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts and then decide which of the given two Conclusions logically follows from the information given in the statements and mark the option best suited.

Statement :

I. No sweet are toffee.

II. No toffee are coffee.

III. No toffee are ice cream.

Conclusion :

I. Some sweet are coffee is a possibility.

II. Some coffee are ice cream is a possibility.

III. No sweet are ice cream is a possibility.

In the question below, two statements are given followed by Conclusions numbered I and II. The candidate has to assume all the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts and then decide which of the given two Conclusions logically follows from the information given in the statements and mark the option best suited.

Statements:

I. Some trees are plants.

II. All bushes are plants.
 
Conclusions:

I. At least some trees are bushes.

II. Some trees are definitely not bushes.

Directions : In the question, given below, there are two statements labelled as Assertion (A) and Reason (R).

Assertion (A) :  India is a democratic country.

Reason (R) : India has a Constitution of its own.

Directions : In the question, given below, there are two statements labelled as Assertion (A) and Reason (R).

Assertion (A) :  In India, females have higher life expectancy than the males.

Reason (R) : Females receive a better diet.

In the question below, two statements are given followed by Conclusions numbered I and II. The candidate has to assume all the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts and then decide which of the given two Conclusions logically follows from the information given in the statements and mark the option best suited.

Statement :

I. No milk is tea.

II. No tea is sugar.

Conclusion :

I. All milk is sugar is a possibility.

II. Some milk is sugar is a possibility.

In the question below, three statements are given followed by Conclusions numbered I, II and III. The candidate has to assume all the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts and then decide which of the given two Conclusions logically follows from the information given in the statements and mark the option best suited.

Statement :

I. No sweet are toffee.

II. No toffee are coffee.

III. No toffee are ice cream.

Conclusion :

I. No sweet are toffee.

II. Some sweet are toffee.

III. All sweet are toffee.

In the question below, two statements are given followed by Conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume all the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts and then decide which of the given two Conclusions logically follows from the information given in the statements and mark the option best suited.

Statements:

I. No toffee is coffee.

II. No sweet is toffee.
 
Conclusions:
I. No coffee are toffee.

II. All sweets are coffee is a possibility.

Direction : - In the problem below are given three statements followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.

Statement :

I. All pasta are macronis.

II. Some pasta are pizza.

III. Some macronis are pastry.

Conclusion :

I. All pizza are pastry is a possibility.

II. All macronis is pasta.

III. Some macronis are pizza.

In the question below, two statements are given followed by Conclusions numbered I, II and III. The candidate has to assume all the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts and then decide which of the given two Conclusions logically follows from the information given in the statements and mark the option best suited.

Statement:

I.Some schools are classes.

II. Some classes are teachers.

III. All teachers are students.

Conclusions:

I. Some students are classes.

II. All schools being students is a possibility.

III. Some school are teachers.

Read the following information carefully and answer the question given below it:

A company has following Gratuity (G) and provident Fund (PF) rules :

(1) An employee must have completed one year's service to be eligible for either G or PF.

(2) An employee resigning or retiring or retrenched after ten years' service gets both G and PF.

(3) An employee retrenched or retiring after 5 years but before 10 years' service gets both G and PF, but that resigning during this period gets either G or PF.

(4) An employee retrenched or retiring before 5 years' service gets PF but not G; but that resigning during this period gets neither G nor PF.

However,

(5) in case an employee dies after 2 years' service, his family gets both G and PF.

(6) in case an employee was on leave without pay, such period is deducted from his total years of service and then the above rules are applied.

(7) in the case of a lady employee, if she has completed 2 years' service, two years are added to her actual service before applying the above rules, as a special consideration.

Apply the above rules to the cases described in each of the following questions and decide weather the employee is eligible for G and /or PF.

Mrs. Rashmi served in the company for years and was retrenched.

In the question below, two statements are given followed by Conclusions numbered I and II. The candidate has to assume all the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts and then decide which of the given two Conclusions logically follows from the information given in the statements and mark the option best suited.

Statement :

I. No milk is tea.

II. No tea is sugar.

Conclusion :

I. No milk is sugar is a possibility.

II. No tea is milk is a possibility.

In the question below, two statements are given followed by Conclusions numbered I and II. The candidate has to assume all the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts and then decide which of the given two Conclusions logically follows from the information given in the statements and mark the option best suited.

Statements:

I. Some plants are mountains.

II. All plants are rivers.
 
Conclusions:

I. All mountains are plants.

II. At least some mountains are rivers.

Direction : - In the problem below are given three statements followed by three conclusions numbered I, II . You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.

Statement:
I. Some men are good.

II. Some men are wise

Conclusion:

I. Some wise are men.

II. Some good are wise.

In the question below, two statements are given followed by Conclusions numbered I, II and III. The candidate has to assume all the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts and then decide which of the given two Conclusions logically follows from the information given in the statements and mark the option best suited.

Statements:

I. No milk is tea.

II. No tea is sugar.

III. No sugar is juice.

Conclusions:

I. Some milk are juice.

II. No milk are juice.

In the question below, two statements are given followed by Conclusions numbered I, II and III. The candidate has to assume all the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts and then decide which of the given two Conclusions logically follows from the information given in the statements and mark the option best suited.

Statement :

I. Some paint are shoes.

II. Some shoes are sleepers.

III. All sleepers are shirt.

Conclusion :

I. Some paint are shirt.

II. All paint are shirt.

In the question below, three statements are given followed by Conclusions numbered I, II and III. The candidate has to assume all the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts and then decide which of the given two Conclusions logically follows from the information given in the statements and mark the option best suited.

Statement :

I. No sweet are toffee.

II. No toffee are coffee.

III. No coffee are cup.

Conclusion :

I. No coffee is cup.

II. Some coffee is cup.

III. No coffee is cup.

Direction : - In the problem below are given three statements followed by three conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.

Statement :

I. Some boy are strong.

II. Some strong are bird.

Conclusion :

I. Some strong are boy is a possibility.

II.Some bird are strong is a possibility.

In the question below, two statements are given followed by Conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume all the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts and then decide which of the given two Conclusions logically follows from the information given in the statements and mark the option best suited.

Statement:
I. No colour is a paint.
II. No colour is a varnish.

Conclusion:
I. No varnish is a paint
II. At least some varnishes are paints

Direction : - In the problem below are given three statements followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.

Statement :

I. All pasta are macronis.

II. Some pasta are pizza.

III. Some macronis are pastry.

Conclusion :

I. All pasta are pastry.

II. Some pasta are pastry.

III. Some macronis are pizza is a possibility.

In the question below, three statements are given followed by Conclusions numbered I, II and III. The candidate has to assume all the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts and then decide which of the given two Conclusions logically follows from the information given in the statements and mark the option best suited.

Statement :

I. No sweet are toffee.

II. No toffee are coffee.

III. No coffee are cup.

Conclusion :

I.All cup are coffee.

II. All coffee are toffee.

III. All toffee are sweet.

In the question below, two statements are given followed by Conclusions numbered I, II and III. You have to assume all the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts and then decide which of the given two Conclusions logically follows from the information given in the statements and mark the option best suited.

Statement :

I. All bush are plant.

II. Some herb are plant.

III. Some tree are plant.

Conclusion :

I. Some herb are tree.

II. Some tree are bush.

III. Some bush are herb.

In the question below, two statements are given followed by Conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume all the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts and then decide which of the given two Conclusions logically follows from the information given in the statements and mark the option best suited.

Statements:

I. No toffee is coffee.

II. No sweet is toffee.
 
Conclusions:

I. No coffee is sweet.

II. All sweets are coffee.

Example 2. Study the following information carefully to answer the questions given below :

Following criteria have been laid down for admission to Anti - Terrorist Defensive course of India Army.

The candidate must ----

(A) have passed graduation with Science subjects (B. Sc.) with minimum 50% marks in aggregated (second class). For SC/ST candidates, there is a relaxation of 5%.

(B) have completed 19 years of age in case of females and 20 years of age in case of males on or before Ist January 2003.

(C) pay deposit of Rs. 25,000 along with the application form if the applicant has passed graduation in second Class.

However, if the applicant has secured more than 75% marks at graduation, the deposit amount would be Rs. 15,000 and if marks are above 60% but below 75%, the deposit amount will be Rs. 20,000. If the candidate is a son or daughter of the serving or ex - defence staff member, the amount of deposit will be 50% of that applicable to others, keeping the merit criteria the same.

(D) For SC/ST candidates, the deposit amount is 20% of that applicable to non - staff relation candidates and the condition of marks for each slab described above in (C) is relaxable by 5%

(E) If a candidate fulfills the criteria at (A) and (B) but can pay at least three - fourths amount of applicable deposit, he/she may be provisionally admitted.

(F) If a candidate who is eligible under (A) and (B) criteria, can pay at least half of the applicable deposit, the case can be referred to the Commander - in - chief.

(G) The candidate who are eligible under the criteria (A) and (B) but cannot pay even half of the applicable deposit cannot be admitted.

Based on the above criteria, decide which of the following courses of action should be taken in case of the candidates whose description is provided in the following questions. Please note that are not to assume any data other than those described. However, you may treat the candidate as 'General Category' candidate if his category is not explicitly mentioned as SC/ST. The information provided is as on 1.1.2003.

1.  Rahul, the son of a staff member of the Indian Army, has passed his B.Sc. examination with 46% and M.Sc. April, 2001. He can Rs. 15,000 as deposit.