In the question below, two statements are given followed by Conclusions numbered I, II and III. You have to assume all the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts and then decide which of the given two Conclusions logically follows from the information given in the statements and mark the option best suited.

Statement :

I. All reward are medal.

II. All medal are award.

III. Some gold are medal.

Conclusion :

I.Some gold are medal.

II. Some gold are award.

III. All reward are award.

In the question below, three statements are given followed by Conclusions numbered I, II and III. The candidate has to assume all the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts and then decide which of the given two Conclusions logically follows from the information given in the statements and mark the option best suited.

Statement :

I. No sweet are toffee.

II. No toffee are coffee.

III. No coffee are cup.

Conclusion :

I. All cup are coffee is a possibility.

II. Some coffee are toffee is a possibility.

III. Some toffee are sweet is a possibility.

In the question below, three statements are given followed by Conclusions numbered I, II and III. The candidate has to assume all the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts and then decide which of the given two Conclusions logically follows from the information given in the statements and mark the option best suited.

Statement :

I. No sweet are toffee.

II. No toffee are coffee.

III. No toffee are ice cream.

Conclusion :

I. Some sweet are coffee is a possibility.

II. Some coffee are ice cream is a possibility.

III. No sweet are ice cream is a possibility.

Read the following information carefully and answer the question given below it:

A company has following Gratuity (G) and provident Fund (PF) rules :

(1) An employee must have completed one year's service to be eligible for either G or PF.

(2) An employee resigning or retiring or retrenched after ten years' service gets both G and PF.

(3) An employee retrenched or retiring after 5 years but before 10 years' service gets both G and PF, but that resigning during this period gets either G or PF.

(4) An employee retrenched or retiring before 5 years' service gets PF but not G; but that resigning during this period gets neither G nor PF.

However,

(5) in case an employee dies after 2 years' service, his family gets both G and PF.

(6) in case an employee was on leave without pay, such period is deducted from his total years of service and then the above rules are applied.

(7) in the case of a lady employee, if she has completed 2 years' service, two years are added to her actual service before applying the above rules, as a special consideration.

Apply the above rules to the cases described in each of the following questions and decide weather the employee is eligible for G and /or PF.

Mr. Dixit resigned from the company after 4 years of service.

In the question below, two statements are given followed by Conclusions numbered I and II. The candidate has to assume all the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts and then decide which of the given two Conclusions logically follows from the information given in the statements and mark the option best suited.

Statement :

I. Some boy are strong.

II. Some strong are bird.

Conclusion :

I. Some boy are bird.

II. No boy are bird.
 

Study the following information carefully to answer the questions given below :

Following criteria have been laid down for admission to Anti - Terrorist Defensive course of India Army. The candidate must ----

(A) have passed graduation with Science subjects (B. Sc.) with minimum 50% marks in aggregated (second class). For SC/ST candidates, there is a relaxation of 5%.

(B) have completed 19 years of age in case of females and 20 years of age in case of males on or before Ist January 2003.

(C) pay deposit of Rs. 25,000 along with the application form if the applicant has passed graduation in second Class.

However, if the applicant has secured more than 75% marks at graduation, the deposit amount would be Rs. 15,000 and if marks are above 60% but below 75%, the deposit amount will be Rs. 20,000. If the candidate is a son or daughter of the serving or ex - defence staff member, the amount of deposit will be 50% of that applicable to others, keeping the merit criteria the same.

(D) For SC/ST candidates, the deposit amount is 20% of that applicable to non - staff relation candidates and the condition of marks for each slab described above in (C) is relaxable by 5%

(E) If a candidate fulfills the criteria at (A) and (B) but can pay at least three - fourths amount of applicable deposit, he/she may be provisionally admitted.

(F) If a candidate who is eligible under (A) and (B) criteria, can pay at least half of the applicable deposit, the case can be referred to the Commander - in - chief.

(G) The candidate who are eligible under the criteria (A) and (B) but cannot pay even half of the applicable deposit cannot be admitted.

Based on the above criteria, decide which of the following courses of action should be taken in case of the candidates whose description is provided in the following questions. Please note that you are not to assume any data other than those described. However, you may treat the candidate as 'General Category' candidate if his category is not explicitly mentioned as SC/ST. The information provided is as on 1.1.2003.

Sulekha, the daughter of an ex - employee of ABC Medical College, was born on 23rd October, 1983. She has passed her B.Sc with 58% marks. She can pay only Rs. 20,000 as deposit.

Directions : In the question, given below, there are two statements labelled as Assertion (A) and Reason (R).

Assertion (A) :  Petrol fire cannot be extinguished by pouring water over it.

Reason (R) : Water is heavier than petrol.

In the question below, two statements are given followed by Conclusions numbered I, II and III. You have to assume all the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts and then decide which of the given two Conclusions logically follows from the information given in the statements and mark the option best suited.

Statement :

I. All reward are medal.

II. All medal are award.

III. Some gold are medal.

Conclusion :

I.Some gold are reward is a possibility.

II.Some gold are award.

III.All reward are gold is a possibility.

In the question below, two statements are given followed by Conclusions numbered I, II and III. You have to assume all the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts and then decide which of the given two Conclusions logically follows from the information given in the statements and mark the option best suited.

Statement :

I. Some wise are man.

II. Some man are good.

III. Some honest are wise as well as man.

Conclusion :

I. Some honest are man.

II. Some good are wise is a possibility.

III. Some good are honest is a possibility.

In the question below, two statements are given followed by Conclusions numbered I, II and III. You have to assume all the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts and then decide which of the given two Conclusions logically follows from the information given in the statements and mark the option best suited.

Statement :

I. All reward are medal.

II. All medal are award.

III. Some gold are medal.

Conclusion :

I. Some award are medal.

II. Some medal are reward.

III. Some gold are award.

Read the following information carefully and answer the question given below it:

A company has following Gratuity (G) and provident Fund (PF) rules :

(1) An employee must have completed one year's service to be eligible for either G or PF.

(2) An employee resigning or retiring or retrenched after ten years' service gets both G and PF.

(3) An employee retrenched or retiring after 5 years but before 10 years' service gets both G and PF, but that resigning during this period gets either G or PF.

(4) An employee retrenched or retiring before 5 years' service gets PF but not G; but that resigning during this period gets neither G nor PF.

However,

(5) in case an employee dies after 2 years' service, his family gets both G and PF.

(6) in case an employee was on leave without pay, such period is deducted from his total years of service and then the above rules are applied.

(7) in the case of a lady employee, if she has completed 2 years' service, two years are added to her actual service before applying the above rules, as a special consideration.

Apply the above rules to the cases described in each of the following questions and decide weather the employee is eligible for G and /or PF.

Miss Monika served for years and was retrenched.

In the question below, two statements are given followed by Conclusions numbered I, II and III. The candidate has to assume all the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts and then decide which of the given two Conclusions logically follows from the information given in the statements and mark the option best suited.

Statements:

I. Some pizzas are pasta.

II. All pastas are macaronis.

III. Some macaronis are pastries.

Conclusions:

I. All pizzas being macaronis is a possibility.

II. All pastas are pizzas.

III. Some pasta is pastry.

In the question below, three statements are given followed by Conclusions numbered I, II and III. The candidate has to assume all the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts and then decide which of the given two Conclusions logically follows from the information given in the statements and mark the option best suited.

Statement :

I. No sweet are toffee.

II. No toffee are coffee.

III. No toffee are ice cream.

Conclusion :

I. Some sweet are coffee is a possibility.

II. All sweet are coffee is a possibility.

III. No sweet are coffee is a possibility.

In the question below, two statements are given followed by Conclusions numbered I and II. The candidate has to assume all the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts and then decide which of the given two Conclusions logically follows from the information given in the statements and mark the option best suited.

Statement:

I. No colour is a paint.

II. No colour is a varnish.

Conclusion:

I. Some varnish are paint.

II. No varnish are paint.

In the question below, two statements are given followed by Conclusions numbered I and II. The candidate has to assume all the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts and then decide which of the given two Conclusions logically follows from the information given in the statements and mark the option best suited.

Statement :

I. All sofa are bed.

II. Some bed are table.

Conclusion :

I. Some sofa are table.

II. All sofa a re table.

Study the following information carefully to answer the questions given below. Following are the qualifications for a certain post in a reputed company. The candidate must

• (A) be an Engineering graduate with at least 60% marks.
• (B) be not less than 21 years and not more than 25 years of age as on 1.5.2006.
• (C) have passed the selection test with at least 55% marks.
• (D) be willing to pay a deposit of Rs. 50,000, to be refunded on completion of training.

However, if a candidate fulfills the above mentioned criteria except:

• (i) at (A) above, but has appeared for the last semester examination and has obtained an aggregate of minimum 65% marks in first seven semesters, his/her case may be referred to the V.P. of the company;
• (ii) at (D) above, but is willing to pay an amount of at least Rs. 25,000 and has obtained at least 70% marks at engineering degree, the case may be referred to the General Manager of the company.

In the following question, detail of the candidate is given as regards his/her candidature. You have to read the information provided and decide his/her status based on the conditions given above and the information provided. You are not to assume anything other than the information provided in each of the following questions. All these cases are given to you as on 1.5.2006.

Rajan has appeared for the last semester of engineering degree exam and is hoping to score at least 70% marks. He has scored upto first seven semesters is 72%. He has just completed 21 years of age. He has scored 63% marks in the selection test and is ready to pay an amount of Rs. 50,000 as deposit.

In the question below, three statements are given followed by Conclusions numbered I, II and III. The candidate has to assume all the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts and then decide which of the given two Conclusions logically follows from the information given in the statements and mark the option best suited.

Statement :

I. No sweet are toffee.

II. No toffee are coffee.

III. No coffee are cup.

Conclusion :

I. No coffee is toffee.

II. Some toffee are coffee.

III. No cup is toffee.

In the question below, three statements are given followed by Conclusions numbered I, II and III. The candidate has to assume all the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts and then decide which of the given two Conclusions logically follows from the information given in the statements and mark the option best suited.

Statement :

I. No sweet are toffee.

II. No toffee are coffee.

III. No coffee are cup.

Conclusion :

I. No sweet are coffee is a possibility.

II. Some toffee are cup is a possibility.

III. Some coffee are cup is a possibility.

Study the following information carefully to answer the questions given below :

Following criteria have been laid down for admission to Anti - Terrorist Defensive course of India Army. The candidate must ----

(A) have passed graduation with Science subjects (B. Sc.) with minimum 50% marks in aggregated (second class). For SC/ST candidates, there is a relaxation of 5%.

(B) have completed 19 years of age in case of females and 20 years of age in case of males on or before Ist January 2003.

(C) pay deposit of Rs. 25,000 along with the application form if the applicant has passed graduation in second Class.

However, if the applicant has secured more than 75% marks at graduation, the deposit amount would be Rs. 15,000 and if marks are above 60% but below 75%, the deposit amount will be Rs. 20,000. If the candidate is a son or daughter of the serving or ex - defence staff member, the amount of deposit will be 50% of that applicable to others, keeping the merit criteria the same.

(D) For SC/ST candidates, the deposit amount is 20% of that applicable to non - staff relation candidates and the condition of marks for each slab described above in (C) is relaxable by 5%

(E) If a candidate fulfills the criteria at (A) and (B) but can pay at least three - fourths amount of applicable deposit, he/she may be provisionally admitted.

(F) If a candidate who is eligible under (A) and (B) criteria, can pay at least half of the applicable deposit, the case can be referred to the Commander - in - chief.

(G) The candidate who are eligible under the criteria (A) and (B) but cannot pay even half of the applicable deposit cannot be admitted.

Based on the above criteria, decide which of the following courses of action should be taken in case of the candidates whose description is provided in the following questions. Please note that you are not to assume any data other than those described. However, you may treat the candidate as 'General Category' candidate if his category is not explicitly mentioned as SC/ST. The information provided is as on 1.1.2003.

Rashmi, the daughter of a teacher, has passed her B.Sc with 78% marks. She was born on 23rd September, 1980. She can pay maximum of Rs. 8000 as deposit.

In the question below, three statements are given followed by Conclusions numbered I, II and III. The candidate has to assume all the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts and then decide which of the given two Conclusions logically follows from the information given in the statements and mark the option best suited.

Statement :

I. No sweet are toffee.

II. No toffee are coffee.

III. No toffee are ice cream.

Conclusion :

I. All sweet are coffee.

II. No coffee are toffee.

III. No ice cream are toffee.

In the question below, two statements are given followed by Conclusions numbered I, II and III. You have to assume all the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts and then decide which of the given two Conclusions logically follows from the information given in the statements and mark the option best suited.

Statement :

I. Some wise are man.

II. Some man are good.

III. Some honest are wise as well as man.

Conclusion :

I. Some good are wise is a possibility.

II. All good are wise is a possibility.

III. Some wise are honest is a possibility.

Direction : - In the problem below are given three statements followed by three conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.

Statement :

I. Some wise are man.

II.Some man are good.

Conclusion :

I. Some good are man.

II. Some good are wise is a possibility.

In the question below, two statements are given followed by Conclusions numbered I, II and III. The candidate has to assume all the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts and then decide which of the given two Conclusions logically follows from the information given in the statements and mark the option best suited.

Statements:

I. No milk is tea.

II. No tea is sugar.

III. No sugar is juice.

Conclusions:

I. Some milk are juice.

II. No milk are juice.

In the question below, two statements are given followed by Conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume all the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts and then decide which of the given two Conclusions logically follows from the information given in the statements and mark the option best suited.

Statement :

I. Some mountain are plant.

II. All plant are river.

Conclusion :

I. No river are plant.

II. Some river are plant.

In the question below, two statements are given followed by Conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume all the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts and then decide which of the given two Conclusions logically follows from the information given in the statements and mark the option best suited.

Statement :

I. Some mountain are plant.

II. All plant are river.

Conclusion :

I. No river are mountain.

II. Some river are mountain.

Directions : In the question, given below, there are two statements labelled as Assertion (A) and Reason (R).

Assertion (A) :  Legumes revive the soil fertility.

Reason (R) : Microbes in the root nodules of legumes fix the atmospheric nitrogen.

In the question below, three statements are given followed by Conclusions numbered I, II and III. The candidate has to assume all the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts and then decide which of the given two Conclusions logically follows from the information given in the statements and mark the option best suited.

Statement :

I. No sweet are toffee.

II. No toffee are coffee.

III. No coffee are cup.

Conclusion :

I. All cup are coffee is a possibility.

II. All coffee are toffee is a possibility.

III. All toffee are sweet is a possibility.

In the question below, two statements are given followed by Conclusions numbered I, II and III. You have to assume all the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts and then decide which of the given two Conclusions logically follows from the information given in the statements and mark the option best suited.

Statement :

I. All reward are medal.

II. All medal are award.

III. Some gold are medal.

Conclusion :

I. Some medal are reward is a possibility.

II. Some gold are reward.

III. All award are reward is a possibility.

In the question below, three statements are given followed by Conclusions numbered I, II and III. The candidate has to assume all the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts and then decide which of the given two Conclusions logically follows from the information given in the statements and mark the option best suited.

Statement :

I. No sweet are toffee.

II. No toffee are coffee.

III. No coffee are cup.

Conclusion :

I. Some cup are coffee.

II. Some coffee are toffee.

III. Some toffee are sweet.

In the question below, three statements are given followed by Conclusions numbered I and II. The candidate has to assume all the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts and then decide which of the given two Conclusions logically follows from the information given in the statements and mark the option best suited.

Statement :

I. Some ball are bat.

II. No bat are toy.

III. All doll are toy.

Conclusion :

I. Some ball are doll.

II. All ball are doll.