In the above question, the following arguments are given

I. Yes. There is urgent need of qualified doctors and the ration between doctors and the citizens is the lowest in India.

II. No. The Government should ensure quality education in the existing medical colleges as majority of the colleges lack necessary infrastructure.

As of 21 May 2020, there are 542 medical colleges and 64 stand alone PG Institutes in India whose qualifications are recognized by the National Medical Commission.

India's medical schools are usually called medical colleges.Medical school quality is controlled by the central regulatory authority, the National Medical Commission, which inspects the institutes from time to time and recognizes institutes for specific courses. Most of the medical schools were set up by the central and state governments in the 1950s and 60s. But in the 1980s, several private medical institutes were founded in several states, particularly in Karnataka. Andhra Pradesh state allowed the founding of several private institutions in the new millennium.Medical education in a private institute can be expensive if not subsidized by the government.

Clearly, providing the existing Medical colleges with modern and more sophisticated infrastructure can help them produce more and much learned doctors, as they can then cater to more student and provide quality education. So. only argument II holds strong while I does not.

Hence the correct option is A.

In the above question, the following arguments are given

I. Yes. A sensible ragging helps the college boys to step into manhood and teaches them to take trifles in a good humour.

II. No. The tortures inflicted in the name of ragging and the humiliation suffered by young boys and girls often go beyond limits.

Ragging is the term used for the so-called "initiation ritual" practiced in higher education institutions in the Indian subcontinent, including India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Srilanka. The practise is similar to hazing in North America,bizutage in France,praxe in Portugal, and other similar practices in educational institutions across the world. Ragging involves abuse, humiliation, or harassment of new entrants or junior students by the senior students. It often takes a malignant form wherein the newcomers may be subjected to psychological or physical torture.In 2009, the University Grants Commission of India imposed regulations upon Indian universities to help curb ragging and launched a tollfree  'anti-ragging helpline'.

Ragging is a subset of bullying. Unlike various complex forms of bullying, ragging is easily recognisable.

In Sri Lanka inception of ragging can be pleasant at first, hence the name 'Mal Samaya'. During this week or so, all newcomers are ordered to memorize the name and hometown of their peers as well as details of their immediate relatives. The objective of this exercise is said to be increasing the friendship among batch mates.

Clearly, sensible ragging makes students broad- minded and well - acquainted with each other. So, argument I is strong. However, sometimes, these young boys and girls are tortured and humiliated too much in the name of ragging, which makes it an unhealthy practice. So, argument II also strong.

Hence the correct option is D.

In the above question, the following arguments are given

I. Yes. The assessment of answers to objective type questions is fair and impartial.

II. No. The descriptive type test is certainly a better tool than the objective type test.

Difference between Objective and Subjective is explained here in detail.

Whenever the statement can be debated, whenever the observations or assessments are laced with personal interpretations and not based on facts, then one can say that the statement is subjective in nature.

Objective means making an unbiased, balanced observation based on facts which can be verified. A statement or assessment is said to be objective when it can be verified and it does not have any interpretations based on emotions of a person.

Clearly, judgement in descriptive tests depends upon the individual who judges while that in objective tests is precise, fair and impartial. So, argument I alone holds strong while II is vague.

Hence the correct option is D.