In the above question, the following arguments are given

I. Yes. privatization will make these institutes financially healthy, competitive and quality conscious.

II. Yes. Privatization is the key of the new era - can we survive without it ?

III. No. Standard of education of these institutes will fall.

Private education is always superior to public for the simple reason of incentives. In a situation where there is no public education system, Private schools would be forced to compete against each other for customers, Which would grant the family a larger and better choice of schools or other institutes. Furthermore private schools depend on their reputation in order to gain new customers, This means that they would have a vested interest in ensuring that those who are most intelligent are taken care of and given scholarships since they are the ones who will improve their reputation later on.

Clearly, privatization leads to betterment in a bid win over the others in the field and earn both good reputation and money. So, argument I holds strong. Besides, privatization cannot be opted for just because it is the present trend. Also, privatization would, in no way, deteriorate the education standards. So, neither II nor III holds.

Hence the correct option is C.

In the above question, the following arguments are given

I. Yes It be beneficial for those candidates who are unable to bear the expenses of entrance tests.

II. Yes. Many deserving candidates securing high marks in their qualifying academic examinations do not perform well o such entrance tests.

III. No. The standard of examinations and assessment conducted by different Boards tests to calibrate them on a common yardstick.

Entrance exams play a very important role in a student's life. Entrance exams determine if the student is ready and prepared to perform in the academic environment. These entrance examscheck the level of the student and accordingly provide them proper career path in their life.Entrance exams are also conducted in order to determine at which level of the student should be placed upon entrance to the schools and colleges. It benefits the students and the school or colleges to have the students properly positioned within the school or colleges in order to achieve the maximum educational benefits.These entrance exams develop confidence and increase the self-esteem in the students and theyalso get the strength from knowing that they are eligible to pursue the education in that particular field. It also helps a lot to bring an improvement in the individual’s knowledge. These entranceexams have various scopes since it provides a chance of forming a well-built educational foundation in the present competitive market. It is also to judge the student ability, sharpness,knowledge etc. The aptitude of the student is tested through the various entrance exams. These entrance exams not only judge the student ability, sharpness, knowledge but also their overall aptitude level and accordingly provide them merit list to take admission in various top colleges or universities depending upon their rank.

Clearly, a policy to select deserving candidates cannot be abolished just because of the expenditure it entails. so, argument I does not hold. Also, students who are intelligent enough to secure good marks in academic exams have no reason not perform well in entrance tests. So, II also does not hold. Further, the students passed out from different universities to uniforms test and assessment. So, only III holds strong.

Hence the correct option is D.

In the above question, the following arguments are given

I. Yes. This will boost the demand of domestically developed seeds.

II. No. This is the only way to increase production substantially.

III. Yes. Genetically modified products will adversely affect the health of those who consume these products.

Genetically modified organisms (GMO), mainly crop plants, are increasingly grown worldwide leading to large trade volumes of living seeds and other plant material both for cultivation and for food and animal feed. Even though all the traded GMOs have been assessed for their safety with regards to human and animal health and the environment, there still are some concerns regarding the potential uncontrolled release in the environment of authorized or unauthorized GM plants. In this review, we identify the possible entrance routes of GM seeds and other propagating plant material in the EU which could be linked to unauthorized release of GMOs in the environment. In addition, we discuss the situation with GM plant cultivation in some non-EU countries in terms of potential risks for GM seed imports. The available body of information suggests that GM seeds and plant propagating material can enter the EU due to problems with labeling/traceability of GM seed lots, contamination of conventional seed lots and accidental release into the environment of grains imported for food and animal feed. Even though cases of uncontrolled release of authorized GMOs, as well as, release of unauthorized GMOs have been reported, they can be generally attributed to adventitious and technically unavoidable presence with little environmental impact. In conclusion, the probability of GM seeds and plant propagating material illegally entering the cultivation in EU is unlikely. However, specific monitoring programs need to be established and maintained to facilitate the compliance of European farmers with the current GMO legislation.

Genetically modified seeds have been specially formulated to increase the yield and quality of produce. So, argument II is strong. Besides, increase in production holds much more significance than the sale of domestically produced seeds. Thus, argument I does not hold. Also, the genetically modified seeds result in a produce of finer which is no way harmful to the consumer. So, III also does not strong.

Hence the correct option is B.